-
Section 1: Responsible Persons, Primary Contact, and Affiliations
This section identifies who the IRB should contact and who is responsible for the study.
-
This is the individual the IRB will contact regarding questions, determinations, and approval notifications.
For student‑led research, this is typically the student coordinating the project.
-
-
-
Is this a student‑led research project? *
-
The Principal Investigator (PI) is the individual with overall responsibility for the design, conduct, and compliance of the research study.
For undergraduate student research, the faculty advisor must be listed as the Principal Investigator.
-
-
-
Does this project involve more than one student investigator? *
-
-
List the names of all student researchers involved in this study.
-
Undergraduate student research requires a faculty advisor who provides oversight and serves as the Principal Investigator.
-
Section 2: External Investigators
-
Does this study involve investigators from another institution or organization? *
-
-
Section 3: Additional Study Personnel (Key Personnel)
-
Are there any additional individuals (e.g., research assistants, staff, or volunteers) who will interact with participants or have access to identifiable data for this study? *
-
-
Section 4: Training Confirmation
-
Human Subjects Research Training *
-
Section 5: Study Overview/Abstract
-
Project Classification *
Select the category that best describes the primary intent of this project. This selection will guide IRB review requirements.
-
-
Provide a brief abstract describing the study. This should include the problem under investigation, relevant background or context (not a full literature review), and the overall purpose of the research. This section should provide context for the study and should not simply restate the research question.
-
-
Is this project part of a thesis, dissertation, honors project, or course requirement? *
-
-
-
Is the intent of this project to contribute to generalizable knowledge (e.g., publication or presentation)? *
-
Explain why this project is considered Quality Improvement, Program Evaluation, or another non‑research activity rather than human subjects research. Include how existing knowledge is being applied, the local scope of the project, and why the activity is not intended to contribute to generalizable knowledge.
-
Section 6: Departmental Approval
-
Does this project require Department Chair approval? *
-
-
-
Department Chair Approval Attestation *
-
Facility / Administrative Approval Attestation *
The IRB does not collect or verify external facility approvals for Quality Improvement projects. By selecting this box, the investigator assumes responsibility for compliance with all applicable institutional and site requirements.
-
List the department, facility, or administrative role that granted approval (e.g., Nursing Administration, Department Chair, Clinical Site).
-
Section 7: Study Procedures & Participants
-
Describe exactly what participants will be asked to do, in what order, and how data will be collected.
-
Include the name of the institution or site and a brief description of the setting. Physical address is not required.
-
What populations will be included in the research? *
-
-
HIPAA / Protected Health Information
Will this project involve access to identifiable Protected Health Information (PHI) as defined under HIPAA? *
-
HIPAA Notice + Acknowledgment *
-
-
Describe who can participate in the study.
Please list the characteristics participants must have to be eligible. Criteria should be directly related to the purpose of the study, not convenience.
-
Exclusion criteria describe who cannot participate in the study, even if they meet the inclusion criteria.
List any characteristics or conditions that would make participation inappropriate, unsafe, or methodologically problematic.
-
This question asks for the largest number of participants who will be involved in the research at the same time during any study activity.
This is not the total number of participants enrolled in the study over time.
Please consider:
Whether participants are involved individually or in groups
The largest session, class, focus group, or observation period
If participation occurs one‑on‑one or individually (e.g., interviews or online surveys), enter 1.
-
Describe how participants will be identified and recruited (e.g., email, flyer, classroom announcement, referral).
-
Does any investigator or study personnel have supervisory, evaluative, or authority responsibilities over potential participants? *
-
-
Section 8: Consent and Assent
-
How will informed consent be obtained? *
-
For Quality Improvement or Program Evaluation projects, explain why informed consent is not required (e.g., use of de‑identified data, standard operational processes, anonymous staff feedback).
-
-
Will assent be obtained from participants unable to consent for themselves?
Participants who may require assent include:
- Children and minors (under age 18)
- Individuals with cognitive impairments
- Individuals with developmental disabilities
- Individuals with conditions that limit decision making capacity
-
-
Section 9: Risks, Benefits, and Confidentiality
-
-
-
-
-
Section 10: Study Materials
-
Will advertisements, surveys, questionnaires, or instruments be used? *
-
-
Section 11: Funding and Compensation
-
Does this study have any source of funding? *
Many student and faculty studies are unfunded. Select “No” if this study has no financial support.
-
-
Will participants receive compensation or incentives? *
-
-
Are there costs to participate? *
-
-
Section 12: Review, Timeline & Certification
-
Does the investigator believe this study qualifies for expedited review? *
-
-
-
I understand this is a legal representation of my signature.
Clear
-
Study Update
Use this section when your approved study is complete, expired, or requires an update.
Adverse Event Reporting: If an adverse event or unanticipated problem occurs during an approved study, investigators must promptly complete the Adverse Event Report Form. Do not wait until an amendment, extension, or study closure is submitted.
-
Current Study Status *
Select the option that best describes the current status of the previously approved IRB study.
-
Enter the date the last participant completed all study‑related activities.
-
Are all data collection activities complete?
-
Are there any outstanding adverse events or unanticipated problems related to this study?
-
-
Will identifiable data be retained after study closure? *
Identifiable data includes names, ID numbers, recordings, or information that could reasonably identify participants
-
-
Study closure requirements acknowledgment *
All statements below must be affirmed to request IRB closure.
-
Principal Investigator confirmation of study closure *
-
-
-
Have there been any changes to procedures, risk level, or subject population?
-
-
Principal Investigator confirmation of extension request *
-
-
Were any participants enrolled prior to early termination?
-
-
Principal Investigator confirmation of early termination *
-
Provide a detailed description of all proposed changes
-
Why are these changes being requested?
-
Which of the following are being changed? (check all that apply) *
-
Will this amendment increase risk to participants?
-
-
Upload all revised documents
Revised consent forms
Recruitment materials
Surveys
Study instruments
Other supporting documents
-
Principal Investigator Amendment Certification
I certify that no proposed changes will be implemented until IRB approval has been received. *
-
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
-